In my mind, library advocacy involves spreading the good word and refuting the others. I have submitted a Letter-to-the-Editor of the Christian Science Monitor in response to a recent article by William H. Wisner entitled “Restore the noble purpose of libraries“. My letter is below in case the CSM does not publish it.
I agree with Mr. Wisner that our libraries are in crisis, however I am concerned that the substance and tone of his commentary do more harm than good.
American libraries are a diverse tapestry of independent organizations that collaborate to provide a rich, democratic, public-service network throughout the country. This tapestry is comprised of public libraries, academic libraries, government libraries and a range of other specialized libaries. Some are noisy and hi-tech as Wisner describes. Others are not.
His assertion that libraries are popular only because they are free is mis-informed. Public libraries are not free. They are funded by citizens who pool their money to acquire and share resources that would be unavailable to them individually.
People use libraries for many reasons. Some appreciate that libaries are safe, egalitarian, non-commercial spaces for relaxation, enjoyment and exploration. Others are drawn to the on-going civic and community activity found at virtually all public libraries. Sadly, some people use libraries because they are one of the few remaining segments in our social safety net—a place to be dry and warm and treated with dignity.
Shrinking library budgets are not reflective of a lack of patron support. Over the past year, patrons across the country have mounted local campaigns to save their libraries. One of the more visible examples has recently unfolded in Ohio.
The national public library funding crisis has multiple sources. It has been seeded and nurtured by a corrosive, 30-year public narrative about “government being the problem”. It is fueled by runaway healthcare costs that gobble up state and municipal budgets, and the corruption of Congress by corporate interests that has resulted in decades of wage stagnation for average Americans and the dramatic depreciation of citizens’ property values and retirement savings. The crisis may be perpetuated by reliance on local funding models that no longer fit new economic realities.
What can be done? As Mr. Wisner suggests, we must reconnect with the timeless mission of our libraries and re-imagine them for the future.
How can this be done? I’d suggest starting at the local library. It contains a wealth of information about municipal governance and relevant subjects like the history of disruptions in commerce, economics and information technology. You’ll find other concerned citizens at your library that you can talk with abour your shared interests. And, if you find yourself a bit overwhelmed, there will be trained professionals nearby whose sole mission is to help you sort out your questions and find some answers.
Thanks to the Annoyed Librarian for the July 20 post on Wisner’s article.
